Monday, February 18, 2008

Is "FUTURE HISTORY" an oxymoronic phrase?

“Future History” is written by governments in the employ of power elites. Wait for the next explosion. But they know what's coming. This is an example of how future history is written in the U.S.

Toward the end of the 2007 United States congressional session, after twelve years of deliberation, a bill was passed by both houses of congress that enables fertilizer of the explosive kind to be manufactured without regulation by the government. Money controlled this dangerous legislation.

What caused a twelve year delay in Congress regulating sales of this explosive? Why did Congress “quietly” pass this legislation? The “Fertilizer bill” states the material is an “explosive.” Did Congress regulate sales of “fertilizer” or “explosive?” Why and how did the bill fall short of the strict law counter-terrorism and federal law enforcement people hoped for?

A knowledgeable experienced government consultant stated that “the bill really does not guaranty anything for the security of the citizens of the United States.” The bill has left “federal officials, outside experts and even some in Congress uncertain about exactly what” this bill is about. Do these words mean that the bill is meaningless if not worthless? Probably. Why did the “fertilizer/explosive” industry pay to support this bill? Did the industry support this garbage legislation BECAUSE it was meaningless and worthless? Is the 8 billion pounds of this material sold in the U.S. alone, a source of income for Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Mississippi, and other lawmakers who enabled this “meaningless and worthless” piece of legislation to endanger the citizenry of this country? (Mississippi is “one of the nation’s largest producers of ammonium nitrate.”)

What happened in Congress smells like fertilizer of the bull kind.

No comments: